Finally two finalists 1.Twitter and facebook , all the others follow them on their ways is there with name only ,
the two sites survived not with the convensional social networking idea, the way they establish, the way way they spread , the way they served , and the way they surprised… the clubbed result is todays fb and twitter.
Facebook from the early 2000s is weakly established in countries like india …its started as a univerisity scope then to corporates and now to all above 13 round the world with immense growth., fb was actually not the first social network on the web, before fb there was many of the same kind. but all of them not serously make research for a long term existance, all of them follo the same techniques and trying to make adicts over theri sites(excactly sites) all of them and their service is limited to their websites and they are apring time to improve their sites and its features
Here the leaders turned into the core level updates., they realized the number of technitians who can contribute to their sites. importance of n number of interfaces to social networks, importance of rapid data irrespective of which way they came
they opened API(Application Programming Interface)with which one can make facebook or twitter webpages if that skilled
this is a wide area and cant be expaned here that level
with the widespread popularity of fb twitter slowly appears in the later half of 2007!
that was a war with concepts. the thread lays where all in fb or similarsites got more hits with their updations, ie if one is not updating regularly he/she ll will out focused, and ofcourse blogger like service need writing and publishing skills
people who dont have friends circle in great diameters and have something to say cant do anything over fb., here played twitter from the word itself it carry a difference (its bit sweeter) and it brings the concept of tweets
Tweets are msgs with max. 140 in length, with @ , DM , RT, # like convensions built in
Tweets fired in a higher frequency like bullets ( aganist fb) and gradually twitter turned to the word of 2009, is not a small thing.
Twitters api is differ from all others (REST) and no of clients in twitter leads before all the predessors
and applications are plenty in the web for twitter
The popularity of twitter make fb to think on the track and started facebook lite and stopped intermediate
almost all sites follow the Twitter status Update in one way or other but finnaly status remains the same TWITTER
in brief fb now follow update to twitter from fb
Popularity wise we cant say fb > twitter or twitter > fb both carry different roles , but when mobility comes web interface lags far behind client apps. apps cannot expose facebook as the features are plenty there but case is different for twitter it had a feature easy to implement( even itz search is not so brilliant). , growth of fb and twitter is also cannot evalute bcz fb aged 10 and twitter only 4